首页> 外文OA文献 >Achievement Goals, Reasons for Goal Pursuit, and Achievement Goal Complexes as Predictors of Beneficial Outcomes : Is the Influence of Goals Reducible to Reasons?
【2h】

Achievement Goals, Reasons for Goal Pursuit, and Achievement Goal Complexes as Predictors of Beneficial Outcomes : Is the Influence of Goals Reducible to Reasons?

机译:成就目标,追求目标的理由以及成就目标的复杂性,作为有益结果的预测指标:目标的影响是否可归因于理性?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the present research, we proposed a systematic approach to disentangling the shared and unique varianceexplained by achievement goals, reasons for goal pursuit, and specific goal-reason combinations (i.e.,achievement goal complexes). Four studies using this approach (involving nearly 1,800 participants) led to 3basic sets of findings. First, when testing goals and reasons separately, mastery (-approach) goals andautonomous reasons explained variance in beneficial experiential (interest, satisfaction, positive emotion) andself-regulated learning (deep learning, help-seeking, challenging tasks, persistence) outcomes. Second, whentesting goals and reasons simultaneously, mastery goals and autonomous reasons explained independentvariance in most of the outcomes, with the predictive strength of each being diminished. Third, when testinggoals, reasons, and goal complexes together, the autonomous mastery goal complex explained incrementalvariance in most of the outcomes, with the predictive strength of both mastery goals and autonomous reasonsbeing diminished. Comparable results were observed for performance (-approach) goals, the autonomousperformance goal complex, and performance goal-relevant outcomes. These findings suggest that achievementgoals and reasons are both distinct and overlapping constructs, and that neither unilaterally eliminates theinfluence of the other. Integrating achievement goals and reasons offers the most promising avenue for a fullaccount of competence motivation.
机译:在本研究中,我们提出了一种系统化的方法来解开由成就目标,追求目标的原因以及特定的目标原因组合(即成就目标复合体)解释的共享和独特方差。使用该方法的四项研究(涉及近1,800名参与者)得出了3个基本发现。首先,当分别测试目标和原因时,精通(接近)目标和自主原因可以解释有益经验(兴趣,满意度,积极情绪)和自我调节学习(深度学习,寻求帮助,挑战性任务,坚持不懈)结果的差异。其次,当同时测试目标和原因时,精通目标和自主原因可以解释大多数结果的独立差异,而每个目标的预测强度都会降低。第三,当将目标,原因和目标复杂化时,自主掌握目标复合体可以解释大多数结果中的增量变化,同时掌握目标和自主原因的预测强度也会降低。对于绩效(-方法)目标,自主绩效目标复合体以及与绩效目标相关的结果,观察到了可比较的结果。这些发现表明成就目标和原因都是截然不同且相互重叠的结构,并且都不能单方面消除对方的影响。整合成就目标和原因为全面了解能力动机提供了最有希望的途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号